Teaching Story

Sell your People with Story

If you work in a company of more than one person, your work colleagues are a critically important to your sales success.

Potential customers don't buy your products and services they buy the expertise of your company to ensure an outcome.

By expertise, I mean the skills of

specific individuals

in your company, not amorphous 'corporate expertise'.

When I was selling for Siemens in the mid-2000s,

we

sold a pre-paid charging system to a telecommunications company for well over $10 million dollars - a deal which took several months to negotiate and close. I was the sales person but

we

sold it, as you will see.

When a deal is closed and celebrated, the sales person usually moves quickly to the next opportunity but I wanted to be sure the buyer was satisfied and I really wanted to know why our company was selected.

We were not the front runner in the early stages and the customer had many choices of supplier, it was a competitive market. So why us?

I met with the main decision maker and we spent most of the meeting discussing the project implementation, which was going well, thankfully. Then, as the meeting drew to a close, I asked:

“Out of curiosity, 

you had several choices for partner in this project, 

why did you choose us?”

The response was instantaneous,

“Voon Tat, your technical expert. 

He took the trouble to understand our technical requirements

And he showed us how we could achieve what we needed. 

He was the difference”

Our technical sales guy was the winning factor, it wasn’t my brilliant salesmanship! Hmm, that’s a blow to the ego.

Back in the office, I reflected on that answer.

When we decided to pursue the opportunity I was concerned that our company didn’t have technical expertise in Australia. In contrast, our main competitors had supplied similar systems in Australia and almost certainly had local experts.

Fortunately, I had worked with Singapore-based Voon Tat* before, so I knew his story and the quality of his work. I recalled telling the customer, “We’re bringing over our best technical expert to work on this", and then I told a story about how Voon Tat and I had worked together on a previous project and how good he was.

Pumping up our technical expert with a story, probably made a difference. Maybe the sales guy played a part afterall?**

End of story.

In fact, it makes a big difference if your potential customer knows about your key people, and stories are much more potent than assertions for delivering that information.

You could assert that your technical expert is highly qualified and brilliant – but everyone says those things - those assertions are

barely heard

. A story, on the other hand is heard and accepted almost at an unconscious level.

We love to hear stories.

Some things to reflect on

1. Everyone has an interesting story. To be able to tell someone’s story you will need to respectfully ask for it and then listen! Then you need to arrange the relevant and interesting parts into a narrative. A great way to learn this skill is to participate in a

story workshop

.

2. Telling stories about your key people early in an opportunity primes the engagement for a trusting partnership

3. Don’t forget to prompt your customer’s key people to tell their stories - that is just as important as telling your stories. When you have shared stories with your customer, you are no longer just a vendor.

Now, whose stories do you need to collect in your organisation?

_____________________________________________________

Company:

Siemens

Source: Mike Adams personal experience

Story Type: Key Staff

_____________________________________________________

For Story Students:

The Setting: Mid-2000s Australia, after winning a deal

The Complications: Won the deal in unlikely circumstances

The Turning Point: Mike went to find out why we won

The Resolution: The technical sales guy was the key reason for winning

The Point of the Story: There are key staff in your organisation - you must position them!

___________________________

** Photo: Top Left: Voon Tat Choong, technical master. 

*Many other people that contributed significantly to winning and keeping this deal including but not limited to (left to right, Top to Bottom) David Adams, David Huck, Peter Barfod, Peter Simms, TeeMeng Foo. My apologies to anyone that I've left out.

Desert Storm - Mohamed's Story

If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs and blaming it on you

----- From ‘If’ by Rudyard Kipling  ------

In 2011, Mohamed, one of our Story workshop participants, was asked to travel from Egypt to Iraq to represent his company in a dispute meeting with a major Iraqi telecommunications company. 

The Iraqi Telco was experiencing serious network failures and the main suppliers, including Mohamed's company, were all pointing the finger at each other.

It was dangerous to travel to Iraq and company security policy required Mohamed to travel by armoured car and dress in full military protective clothing including bullet proof vest.

Alone inside an armoured car en route to Bagdad, Mohamed lifted a bottle of lemonade to his lips to quench his thirst. As the armoured car bounced on the potholed road the lemonade went down his wind pipe and he started to choke.

With the bullet proof vest strapped tightly around his chest, Mohamed panicked. He couldn’t unstrap the bullet proof vest, he couldn’t get the attention of the driver and he couldn’t breathe.

As he fought for breath, Mohamed had a sinking desperate fear that he would die alone inside the armoured car. He even thought to send a text message to his wife with his last few seconds of consciousness.

But eventually he wheezed some shallow breaths and recovered just as the armoured car reached his meeting destination.

Entering a room full of angry, antagonistic suppliers, Mohamed was oblivious to the commotion. He sat calmly and luxuriated in every breath of air, so happy to be alive.

Suddenly accusing voices rounded on Mohamed’s company. It was all his company’s fault!

Wordlessly, Mohamed stood up and went to the whiteboard. The room fell silent. As he sketched the configuration of his company’s technical solution on the whiteboard, Mohamed calmly explained how the network fault could not have been caused by his company’s equipment.

Silence.

“Ok! So it’s not their fault, it must be …” and the room descended back into acrimonious argument.

Mohamed walked back and sat down next to the local manager who turned to him and exclaimed “how did you do that?!”

***

Of course it was Mohamed's newfound existential perspective that allowed him to calmly manage that heated situation. 

It's a great story. We could just enjoy it for its perspective and humour but we could also retell it in a similar fractious situation to help gain agreement.

There is no chance of agreement when the opposing sides are highly emotional and it is the role of a sales person to persuasively shift the emotional landscape to a positive one. We call this type of story a 'sales process' story because it can be used to move a sale forward.

Great stories can be re-purposed and it is not necessary that the events happened to you.

____________________________________

Company: Large Telecoms Supply Company

Source:

Told in a Growth in Focus Story Workshop 2017

Story Type:

Teaching

____________________________________

For Story Students

The Setting:

Iraq after the second gulf war

The Complications:

Mohamed nearly choked to death

The Turning Point:

Mohamed recovered and was calm and composed through a vitriolic dispute meeting

The Resolution:

Mohamed resolved the dispute in is company's favour

The Point of the Story:

Perspective makes a difference

How to use this story: This story can be used to calm a situation where disagreements are getting out of hand. It is an example of a sales or business process story. Here is 

another example

 of a personal story that can be re-purposed for a business situation.

____________________________________

Rejection Antidotes

Pushback (n):  a negative or unfavourable reaction or response.

Mismatch (n):  a failure to correspond or match

____________________

In 2009, while working for a major international supplier of telecommunications equipment, I arranged to meet the CTO of one of Malaysia’s largest mobile network providers. I was accompanied in the meeting by one of our technical sales specialists.

As the meeting warmed up, I asked the CTO how many mobile base stations his company had deployed.

He responded,

“5000”,

Before I could ask my next question, my technical specialist, jumped in with,

“No, you only have 4911!”

Gently kicking the technical guy under the table, I steered the conversation back to my next question.

What just happened?

This was an example of push back, or mismatch. It occurs, often as an automatic response, when a fact or assertion is delivered. In this case, the CTO delivered a ‘fact’ and my technical sales guy pushed back with his own 'adjusted fact'.

While not always verbalised, push back is happening in the minds of all of us when we are presented with ‘facts'. I won't delve into the psychology but it is one of our natural truth and identity processing reflexes.

This automatic push back is often perceived by sales people as rejection of them and their message, when really it's just an automatic response. The trick is to try and avoid making assertions.

In his sales classic, “The Secrets of Question-Based Selling(2000)”, author Tom Freese also describes the

“instinctive tendency of individuals to resist, push back or respond in a contrarian manner”

when sales people make assertions. Freese calls this push back ‘Mismatch”.

Freese goes on to explain that you cannot push back against a question and proceeds to describe a questioning strategy with ‘type’ questions to facilitate the buyer’s journey.

Indeed, it is difficult to push back against a question but it’s also difficult to deliver your company’s insights and positions with questions. Questions are great for demonstrating credibility and exploring and understanding a potential customer’s situation but they are not so great for delivering content. Something else is needed, stories.

Stories are flanking manoeuvres for assertions. With your insights and assertions wrapped in a story you can place the information in the back of your customers mind and avoid automatic push back.

Questions and stories; the persuaders feint and roundhouse kick.

_____________________________________________________

Company: 

Nokia

Source: Mike Adams personal experience

Story Type: Teaching

_____________________________________________________

For Story Students:

The Setting: 2009 in Malaysia

The Complications: A disrupted conversation

The Turning Point: Re focussed conversation and realisation of what has occured,

The Resolution: Meeting returned to questioning

The Point of the Story: Questions and stories are the two dialectic tools for avoiding push back and rejection.

Kinky Performance

Today I decided to clean the upstairs balcony floor at our house. This is the type of procrastination activity I will undertake when I’m avoiding a more important task…

We have a permanently connected cleaning hose on the balcony which hadn’t been used for a couple of years.  As I hosed the balcony I was immediately disappointed by the low water pressure but I reasoned that it was due to the tap location high on the second floor wall.

Twenty minutes later after some energetic scrubbing and feeble dousing, I noticed a kink in the hose. Freeing the kink produced instant good water pressure and suddenly the job was much easier.

A couple of minutes later the pressure dropped again but this time, of course, I knew straight away what to do.

I reflected on the fact that I had been labouring away accepting poor performance but the instant I saw what good performance was possible, I knew what to do and no longer accepted poor performance.

This is exactly what we experience day to day with the sales teams we work with at Growth in Focus. Identifying and modelling what good performance looks and feels like and allowing sales people to experience that improved performance is the path to mastery for individuals and teams.

____________________________________

Company:

Source: Mike Adams personal experience

Reference:

Story Type: Business Purpose

Labels: Values; Beliefs; Control; Personal

____________________________________

For Story Students

The Setting: Mike's House in 2016

The Complications: Poor water pressure while washing the balcony floor

The Turning Point: Locating the kink in the hose and realising the metaphor potential pf the situation

The Resolution: Kept the hose free of kinks and cleaned the floor

The Point of the Story: Kept the hose free of kinks and cleaned the floor

How to use this story: This mini-story is a good example of how you can use everyday experiences as a metaphor to serve a business purpose

____________________________________

The Bus

When we practise ''who have I helped' stories in our Growth in Focus story workshops most attendees tell business stories but occasionally a personal story is told which entrances the group.

Here is an example from workshop attendee Warren:

At various times in Warren's life he has taken up running to maintain his fitness.

While still living in South Africa in the late nineties, he determined to get up at six each morning and go for a run.

Part of the route that Warren ran each morning was along a wide but quiet two-lane straight road.

For comfort, he avoided the uneven gravel next to the road and ran on the tarmac edge. Warren ran on the opposite side of the road so that he could see approaching vehicles.

In the distance Warren saw an oncoming bus.

Since the oncoming two lanes were wide and clear, Warren assumed that the bus would move aside to give him space as he ran along the edge of the road.

But the bus did not move aside. Instead it passed so close that Warren was almost hit by the mirror and he was forced onto the gravel to avoid being run over. As the bus passed, Warren angrily turned around and raised his finger to give the driver the "bird".

As he continued running, Warren thought about what had happened and his own reaction.

He thought it likely that the African driver, who had no doubt struggled to make a living through the Apartheid era, resented having to move over for a young white person who could afford the luxury of running on the road for fitness.

Furthermore, Warren reasoned that his own angry reaction would in no way change the driver's attitude.

In an instant Warren resolved to not be that angry person.

The next morning, 6 am, Warren was running down the same stretch of empty road when in the distance appeared the same bus, obviously on a regular route. Warren maintained his position on the side of the road but as the bus approached he smiled and waved to the driver.

Again he was nearly run off the road.

Next morning same thing, Warren smiled and waved and the bus nearly ran him down.

But the next day when Warren smiled and waved there was a slight wave of one hand from the driver, and the bus didn't pass quite so close.

After that Warren and the bus driver would smile and wave to each other each morning and eventually the bus steered so far from Warren that it was almost in the oncoming traffic.

____________________________________

Company: Personal

Source: As told by Warren Nel at a Growth in Focus Story Workshop 2016

Reference:

Story Type: Values; Personal; Who have we helped

Labels: Values; Beliefs; Control; Personal

____________________________________

For Story Students

The Setting: South Africa when Warren was on one of his fitness kicks

The Complications: The oncoming bus neartly hit Warren

The Turning Point: Warren decided not to be the angry victim, rather to be a smiling friend to the bus driver

The Resolution: Warren and the bus driver became waving and smiling friends on Warren's morning runs

The Point of the Story: Warren and the bus driver became waving and smiling friends on Warren's morning runs

How to use this story: This is a story about personal values and how setting standards for your own behaviour can positively influence others. As Warren says it is about reversing the HAVE --> DO ---> BE sequence

Deciding what you want to BE influences what you DO which in turn leads to what you HAVE

____________________________________

The most expensive dry hole in South East Asia and practising safe questions

A few years ago I accompanied one of my sales people on a customer meeting in Indonesia. In the pre-meeting briefing, I was informed that the person we were meeting, the exploration manager for a mid-sized oil and gas company, had famously just completed drilling the most expensive dry hole in Indonesia. That is, they had spent more than $100 million dollars and failed to find hydrocarbons.

We were selling software that had the potential to avoid a repeat of that failure, so clearly, we would like to discuss the recent dry hole and the reasons for it.

My sales person, however, was nervous about asking, fearing that the topic would be embarrassing for the exploration manager. So I explained a specific question type which is safe for this sort of situation.

The question is: "To what extent is

x

an issue in ...."

When you ask to "what extent is" you are not making any assumption about the answer, so its a safe way to ask.

As we were selling software that could have imaged the target better our question was:

"To what extent was target imaging an issue in your recent non-discovery well?"

Note that this is safer than an alternatives such as:

"Did you have trouble imaging the reservoir in you recent ...?"

With this question the listener is likely to hear "...you have trouble ..." and take offence.

We asked our "to what extent is .." questions, and had a constructive meeting - to the relief of my local sales person.

Learning to ask the right question in the right sequence is critical to sales success and something we teach in our Diamond Dialogue conversation training.

Read more about sales questions at:

http://www.gifocus.com.au/sales-training-academy/diamond

____________________________________

Company

: Mid sized Oil and Gas Company

Source

: Mike Adams personal experience

Reference

:

Story Type

: Teaching

____________________________________

For Story Students

The Setting

: In 2010 I was working in Halliburton as Head of Sales and I had a meeting with an exploration manager who had just drilled the most expensive dry hole well in SE Asia

The Complications

: I needed a way to get the conversation onto the topic of the dry hole without embarrassing the exploration manager

The Turning Point

: I called on my question skills training to devise a safe way to ask about the dry hole useing the "To What Extent ...?" quesion

The Resolution

: We had an engaging conversation and were able to position our software products to prevent future issues

The Point of the Story

: We had an engaging conversation and were able to position our software products to prevent future issues

How to use this story

: We use the story in our sales conversation training and to show the benefits of the Diamond Dialogue questioning framework

____________________________________

When to walk away from a big deal

In the late 1990s, One.Tel tendered for the provision of an Australia-wide mobile phone network. The multi-billion dollar tender attracted aggressive bidding from all of the major multi-national telecommunications equipment companies.

One.Tel was a group of Australian-based telecommunications companies established in 1995, soon after deregulation of the Australian telecommunications industry, with high-profile backers such as the Murdoch and Packer families.

The Australian CEO for Siemens we'll call him Joe, led the bid for Siemens Australia, which was a front runner to win due to its advanced and proven technology.

As the tender negotiations proceeded, Joe became increasingly concerned about One.Tel's requirements for unsecured vendor financing - but approval for Siemens to provide this financing had been received from the Siemens board, and Joe was under pressure to "close the deal".

But something didn't feel right to Joe, he was concerned about the security for the financing and One.Tel's prospects. Despite the financing having been approved by Siemens's notoriously conservative commercial management cadre, Joe decided to pull out of the deal.

Joe's managers backed his decision and the main competitor won the tender.

A year or so later, when One.Tel went into receivership, Joe's competitor lost nearly a billion dollars and his brave decision was vindicated.

____________________________________

Company

: Siemens

Source

: Mike Adams conversations with the main players and Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One.Tel

Reference

: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One.Tel

Story Type

: Teaching

____________________________________

For Story Students

The Setting

: Tendering for a new mobile phone network in late 90's Australia

The Complication

s: One.Tel required the vendors to provide unsecured vendor financing

The Turning Point

: Australian CEO made a gut decision to pull out of the tender process

The Resolution

: Siemens competitor won the tender and lost nearly $1 billion AUD when One.Tel collapsed and went into receivership

The Point of the Story

: Going with your gut feel when something feels wrong about a deal is often the best course of action but it takes courage.

How to use this story

: The story shows the importance of sticking with your convictions

____________________________________

The Siemens art exhibition bypassing tender rules

In the early 2000s  Siemens sales manager Paul Thompson was sweating on the result of a major tender.

It was the 'radio silence' evaluation period when the customer's tendering rules precluded any contact. Paul was nervous about the result and wanted to continue to influence the tender decision process.

Paul found out that his customer did not own their corporate headquarters building, so he organised with the building owner to run a Siemens sponsored art exhibition in the main lobby which the tender evaluation team would pass through each day as they went to work.

Paul was in the art exhibition when the customer's head of procurement walked past, looked at Paul and shook his finger to say "never again", but them smiled.

Paul won that tender.

____________________________________

Company

: Siemens Communications

Source

: Mike Adams discussions with Siemens Head of Sales Paul Thompson

Reference

:

Story Type

: Business Purpose

Labels

: Bending the Rules; Tenders

____________________________________

For Story Students

The Setting

: Early 2000s, Melboune Australia

The Complications

: Siemens were in the 'radio silence' pahse of a very large tender evaluation

The Turning Point

: Paul organised a Siemens sponsored art exhibition in the customer's HQ building lobby

The Resolution

: Siemens got the additional advertising and marketing benefit and procurement amended their tender rules

The Point of the Story

: Siemens got the additional advertising and marketing benefit and procurement amended their tender rules

How to use this story

: When talking abut innovative ways to influence in sales

____________________________________

Pick up the phone to make your quarterly number

I had my first sales role in Stavanger in Norway in 1996. We were selling high-end graphical software to Oil and Gas companies.

There were three salespeople in the team, all new to sales, reporting to the Norway country and sales manager Lars Wiborg. Lars was Swedish and a larger than life character, life of the party (and instigator of a great many of those parties).

It was end of quarter and Lars called us all into his office with its magnificent views across Stavanger harbour to the Lysefiord in the distance. As we sat around his meeting table Lars explained that he was going on vacation and needed to know how we were progressing against our quarterly sales targets.

Lars:

"Mike, what have you got? "

Me:

"Not much, it looks like Amoco will drag to next quarter, Shell already purchased last quarter, I'm not going to make my target"

Lars:

 "Gareth?"

Gareth:

"Conoco won't be buying this month and I don't have any other prospects that will close this quarter"

Lars:

"Bixi?"

Bixi:

"Same story, I've got nothing"

Silence and a dark look from Lars. He then reached for the telephone in the middle of the table, started an animated call in Norwegian.

After a few minutes ...

Lars: 

" Ok, Five Charisma 3D licenses and and two 2D licenses for Statoil

Rings again, more animated and jovial discussion in Norwegian.

Lars:

"Three Stratlog licenses and a Charisma Data Loader for Norsk Hydro. How much does that make?"

Mike:

Yes we got the number but don't stop now! Stay on the phone and we can get our annual target.

It was a fascinating lesson. There was a reason that Lars had us all in his office to observe that performance. Sometimes you can (and must) ask for the business. At that stage none of us had developed the necessary level of customer relationship but we also would not have thought to just pick up the phone and ask.

____________________________________

Company

: Schlumberger

Source

: Mike Adams experience

Reference

:

Story Type

: Teaching

____________________________________

For Story Students

The Setting

: 1996, Stavanger Norway

The Complications

: Sales Manager was taking vacation but there were no orders for the quarter

The Turning Point

: Lars called his major customers and requested and received some orders

The Resolution

: The quarterly number was achieved

The Point of the Story

: The quarterly number was achieved

How to use this story

: When teaching sales people about making the number adn asking for the business

____________________________________

Using 'because' to get away with murder

In the late 1970s, Ellen Langer and some colleagues at Harvard University showed in a simple experiment just how powerful reasons can be.

At the Harvard library there was a single photocopier that always had a line of people waiting to use it. For the experiment, Langer’s colleagues would walk to the front of that line and ask to cut in. If they said it was ‘because I’m in a rush’, 95 per cent of the time the people in the line said yes. But if they gave no reason, only 60 per cent of those queuing said yes.

Interestingly, if the researchers gave a bogus reason but still used the word ‘

because

’, 93 per cent of the people in the line still said yes.

Human beings like reasons, and the the word 'because' is the hypnotic link to the reason. As sales people we need to use the word 'because' such as

"... I'm calling you

because

 I read an article about how you are ,,,"

____________________________________

Company

: Harvard University

Source

: Anecdote website and changingminds.org

Reference

: http://changingminds.org/explanations/needs/rationality.htm

Story Type

: Insight, Teaching

____________________________________

For Story Students

The Setting

: Late 70s at Havard University

The Complications

: Experimenters were investigatimg some surprising human behaviours in the photocopy queue

The Turning Point

: They noticed that even an irrational 'because' led to a compliant queue

The Resolution

: Humans need the 'because' to generate meaning in situations

The Point of the Story

: Humans need the 'because' to generate meaning in situations

How to use this story

: Useful for sales people in cold calling and many other scenarios

____________________________________